HomeCirculars › RBI/2011-12/185

RBI Tightens AML/CFT Screening for Iran, DPRK & 8 Other Nations

Live · in forceNo withdrawal recorded as of 20 Jun 2026. Reviewed by Vikram Jain; always verify against the official RBI source below.
Issued by RBI: 19 Sep 2011  ·  Decoded by BankPulse: 20 Jun 2026, 07:01 IST
⏱ ~2 min read
📄 Official RBI source ↗
Quick answerRBI directs authorised persons to factor in AML/CFT deficiencies of Iran, DPRK, and eight other jurisdictions when onboarding or transacting. This follows FATF's June 2011 call for counter-measures. Legitimate trade with Iran remains permitted.

What changed

RBI updated its earlier May 2011 advisory to reflect FATF's June 24, 2011 statement, which explicitly calls for counter-measures against Iran and DPRK due to ongoing ML/FT risks. It also added eight jurisdictions (Bolivia, Cuba, Ethiopia, Kenya, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Syria, Turkey) that have strategic AML/CFT deficiencies and insufficient progress. The circular mandates authorised persons to assess risks from these countries before entering business relationships.

What it means for you

Banks and authorised persons must now apply enhanced due diligence for any transaction or relationship involving Iran, DPRK, or the eight listed jurisdictions. While legitimate trade with Iran is not prohibited, the risk weightage for these countries has increased significantly. Non-compliance with these AML/CFT guidelines could invite penal action under FEMA and PMLA.

What you must do

Who it affects

All authorised persons (banks, forex dealers, money changers), Compliance and AML/CFT teams, Principal Officers of authorised entities, Constituents (corporate clients) dealing with Iran, DPRK, or the eight listed countries

Does this circular ban all transactions with Iran?

No. The circular explicitly states it does not preclude legitimate trade and business transactions with Iran. However, it requires authorised persons to account for the heightened ML/FT risks from Iran and apply appropriate counter-measures.

Which eight additional countries are flagged for strategic AML/CFT deficiencies?

Bolivia, Cuba, Ethiopia, Kenya, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Syria, and Turkey. These jurisdictions have not made sufficient progress in addressing deficiencies or committed to a FATF action plan.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with this circular?

Non-compliance attracts penal provisions under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, and the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, as amended.

Track this rule
⏳ How this rule evolved — History Map →Full RBI rulebook crosswalk →
AI-drafted · 3-model AI consensus fact-check · under the editorial review of Vikram Jain · decoded & published by BankPulse · 20 Jun 2026, 07:01 IST
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=6717&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by Vikram Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; never reproduces RBI text verbatim.