HomeCirculars › RBI/2011-12/156

RBI Advisory on AML/CFT Risks from Iran, DPRK, and Other Jurisdictions

Digital Payments / UPI
Live · in forceNo withdrawal recorded as of 20 Jun 2026. Reviewed by Vikram Jain; always verify against the official RBI source below.
Issued by RBI: 18 Aug 2011  ·  Decoded by BankPulse: 20 Jun 2026, 07:18 IST
⏱ ~2 min read
📄 Official RBI source ↗
Quick answerRBI directs all payment system operators to assess and mitigate money laundering and terrorist financing risks from Iran, DPRK, and jurisdictions with strategic AML/CFT deficiencies, including Bolivia, Cuba, Ethiopia, Kenya, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Syria, and Turkey.

What changed

RBI updated its earlier April 8, 2011 circular by incorporating FATF's June 24, 2011 statement, which calls for counter-measures against Iran and DPRK due to ongoing ML/FT risks. It also added a list of jurisdictions with strategic AML/CFT deficiencies that have not made sufficient progress, urging operators to consider these risks in business relationships.

What it means for you

Payment system operators must now apply enhanced due diligence for transactions involving Iran, DPRK, and the listed deficient jurisdictions. This does not prohibit legitimate trade with Iran but requires careful risk assessment. Operators need to update their AML/CFT policies and ensure compliance to avoid regulatory action.

What you must do

Who it affects

All payment system operators authorized under the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007, Nodal officers and principal officers of these operators, Compliance and AML/CFT teams within payment systems

Does this circular ban all transactions with Iran?

No, the circular explicitly states it does not preclude legitimate trade and business transactions with Iran. However, operators must apply counter-measures to protect the financial system from ML/FT risks.

Which countries are listed as having strategic AML/CFT deficiencies?

The FATF statement identifies Bolivia, Cuba, Ethiopia, Kenya, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Syria, and Turkey as jurisdictions with deficiencies that have not made sufficient progress.

What action is required from the nodal officer?

The nodal officer or principal officer must acknowledge receipt of this circular, ensuring compliance with the advisory.

Key dataSee the live numbers behind this topic: RBI Penalty Tracker, Credit & Deposit Growth — updated from official RBI data.
Key termsPlain-English definitions of terms in this circular — see the full Indian banking glossary. UPI · KYC / AML · Deposit insurance (DICGC) · NEFT / RTGS
Track this rule
🗂 Master Direction family: Payment & Settlement Systems⏳ How this rule evolved — History Map →Full RBI rulebook crosswalk →
AI-drafted · 3-model AI consensus fact-check · under the editorial review of Vikram Jain · decoded & published by BankPulse · 20 Jun 2026, 07:18 IST
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=6679&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by Vikram Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; never reproduces RBI text verbatim.