HomeCirculars › RBI/2011-12/142

UCBs: Updated FATF Jurisdictions List for AML/CFT Compliance

Live · in forceNo withdrawal recorded as of 20 Jun 2026. Reviewed by Vikram Jain; always verify against the official RBI source below.
Issued by RBI: 03 Aug 2011  ·  Decoded by BankPulse: 20 Jun 2026, 07:26 IST
⏱ ~2 min read
📄 Official RBI source ↗
Quick answerRBI directs all AD Category I Primary Urban Co-operative Banks to review and act on the latest FATF statement (June 24, 2011) identifying jurisdictions with strategic AML/CFT deficiencies. Banks must consider this information in their risk assessments and acknowledge receipt to their Regional Office.

What changed

FATF issued a new statement on June 24, 2011, updating the list of jurisdictions with strategic AML/CFT deficiencies. RBI has forwarded this statement to all AD Category I Urban Co-operative Banks, replacing the earlier list from May 2, 2011. Banks are now required to consider this updated information in their AML/CFT frameworks.

What it means for you

Urban Co-operative Banks must update their AML/CFT risk assessments to reflect the latest FATF-identified jurisdictions. This ensures alignment with global standards and helps mitigate risks of money laundering and terrorist financing. Non-compliance could expose banks to regulatory scrutiny and reputational damage.

What you must do

Who it affects

All AD Category I Primary (Urban) Co-operative Banks, Compliance Officers/Principal Officers of these banks, AML/CFT teams within these banks

What is the purpose of this FATF statement?

The FATF statement identifies jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in their AML/CFT regimes. It calls on members to consider this information when assessing risks and applying countermeasures.

Do we need to take any action beyond acknowledging receipt?

Yes. Banks must consider the information in the statement for their AML/CFT risk assessments and update customer due diligence and monitoring processes as needed.

What happens if we do not comply?

Non-compliance may lead to regulatory action by RBI, including increased scrutiny or penalties, and could expose the bank to higher money laundering and terrorist financing risks.

Track this rule
⏳ How this rule evolved — History Map →Full RBI rulebook crosswalk →
AI-drafted · 3-model AI consensus fact-check · under the editorial review of Vikram Jain · decoded & published by BankPulse · 20 Jun 2026, 07:26 IST
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=6654&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by Vikram Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; never reproduces RBI text verbatim.