HomeCirculars › RBI/2011-12/133

RRBs: Updated FATF AML/CFT Risks on Iran, DPRK & Other Jurisdictions

Live · in forceNo withdrawal recorded as of 20 Jun 2026. Reviewed by Vikram Jain; always verify against the official RBI source below.
Issued by RBI: 28 Jul 2011  ·  Decoded by BankPulse: 20 Jun 2026, 07:33 IST
⏱ ~2 min read
📄 Official RBI source ↗
Quick answerRBI directs RRBs to factor in updated FATF AML/CFT risks from Iran, DPRK, and eight other jurisdictions (Bolivia, Cuba, Ethiopia, Kenya, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Syria, Turkey) when dealing with entities from these countries. Legitimate trade with Iran remains allowed.

What changed

FATF updated its statement on June 24, 2011, calling for counter-measures against Iran and DPRK due to ongoing ML/FT risks. It also flagged eight jurisdictions with strategic AML/CFT deficiencies that haven't made sufficient progress. RBI now requires RRBs to account for these risks in business relationships and transactions.

What it means for you

RRBs must enhance due diligence for any transactions or relationships involving Iran, DPRK, or the eight listed jurisdictions. While legitimate trade with Iran is not prohibited, banks need to assess and mitigate the heightened AML/CFT risks. This aligns with global FATF standards to protect the financial system.

What you must do

Who it affects

All Regional Rural Banks (RRBs), Principal Officers of RRBs, Compliance and AML/CFT teams at RRBs

Does this circular ban all transactions with Iran?

No. The circular explicitly states it does not preclude Indian banks from entering into legitimate trade and business transactions with Iran. However, RRBs must account for the elevated ML/FT risks.

Which jurisdictions are newly flagged for strategic AML/CFT deficiencies?

FATF identified eight jurisdictions: Bolivia, Cuba, Ethiopia, Kenya, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Syria, and Turkey. RRBs must consider risks from these countries in business dealings.

What action is required from the Principal Officer?

The Principal Officer of each RRB must acknowledge receipt of this circular letter to the concerned RBI Regional Office.

Track this rule
⏳ How this rule evolved — History Map →Full RBI rulebook crosswalk →
AI-drafted · 3-model AI consensus fact-check · under the editorial review of Vikram Jain · decoded & published by BankPulse · 20 Jun 2026, 07:33 IST
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=6641&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by Vikram Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; never reproduces RBI text verbatim.