HomeCirculars › RBI/2010-2011/150

FATF-flagged Jurisdictions: Enhanced KYC/AML Checks Required

Live · in forceNo withdrawal recorded as of 20 Jun 2026. Reviewed by Vikram Jain; always verify against the official RBI source below.
Issued by RBI: 02 Aug 2010  ·  Decoded by BankPulse: 20 Jun 2026, 13:18 IST
⏱ ~2 min read
📄 Official RBI source ↗
Quick answerRBI directs banks to apply enhanced due diligence for business with Iran, DPRK, and Sao Tome and Principe due to FATF-identified AML/CFT deficiencies. Iran faces countermeasures; the other two require risk consideration.

What changed

FATF updated its statement on June 25, 2010, dividing deficient jurisdictions into two groups: Iran (subject to countermeasures) and DPRK and Sao Tome and Principe (strategic deficiencies without committed action plans). RBI now requires banks to factor these risks into all relationships and transactions with entities from these countries.

What it means for you

Banks must reassess and potentially tighten controls for any exposure to Iran, DPRK, or Sao Tome and Principe. For Iran, this means applying countermeasures like enhanced monitoring or transaction restrictions. For the other two, a risk-based approach is needed, but the absence of FATF action plans signals higher scrutiny.

What you must do

Who it affects

All Scheduled Commercial Banks (excluding RRBs), Local Area Banks, All India Financial Institutions, Principal Officers of banks

What specific countermeasures are required for Iran?

The circular does not list specific countermeasures; it directs banks to apply measures to protect the financial system from ongoing ML/FT risks. Banks should refer to FATF guidance and their own risk frameworks for appropriate actions.

Does this apply to existing customers from these countries?

Yes, the circular advises banks to consider risks while entering into business relationships and transactions, which implies both new and existing relationships should be reviewed.

What if a customer is only indirectly linked to these jurisdictions?

The circular covers transactions with persons from or in these countries, including legal persons and financial institutions. Banks should assess beneficial ownership and transaction chains for any indirect links.

Track this rule
⏳ How this rule evolved — History Map →Full RBI rulebook crosswalk →
AI-drafted · 3-model AI consensus fact-check · under the editorial review of Vikram Jain · decoded & published by BankPulse · 20 Jun 2026, 13:18 IST
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=5916&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by Vikram Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; never reproduces RBI text verbatim.