HomeCirculars › RBI/2010-11/551

Repo Accounting: FIMMDA Agreement Not Mandatory for CCP-Settled G-Secs

Live · in forceNo withdrawal recorded as of 20 Jun 2026. Reviewed by Vikram Jain; always verify against the official RBI source below.
Issued by RBI: 30 May 2011  ·  Decoded by BankPulse: 20 Jun 2026, 09:26 IST
⏱ ~2 min read
📄 Official RBI source ↗
Quick answerRBI clarifies that the FIMMDA Master Repo Agreement is not mandatory for repo transactions in Government Securities settled through a CCP like CCIL, due to existing safeguards. However, it remains mandatory for bilateral repo transactions in Corporate Debt Securities.

What changed

RBI clarified that the FIMMDA Master Repo Agreement, previously required for all repo transactions, is not mandatory for Government Securities repos settled through a Central Counter Party (CCP) like CCIL. The CCP's built-in safeguards—such as haircuts, MTM pricing, margins, multilateral netting, and dispute resolution—obviate the need for a separate bilateral agreement. For Corporate Debt Securities settled bilaterally without a CCP, the FIMMDA Master Repo Agreement remains mandatory.

What it means for you

Banks and lenders can now execute repo transactions in Government Securities through CCIL without the administrative burden of a separate FIMMDA Master Repo Agreement, streamlining operations. This reduces documentation costs and legal risks for CCP-settled trades, while reinforcing the need for bilateral agreements in corporate debt repos to manage counterparty risk. The clarification ensures market participants align their repo accounting practices with the risk management framework of CCPs.

What you must do

Who it affects

Commercial Banks, Co-operative Banks, Primary Dealers, Financial Institutions, Regional Rural Banks, NBFCs

Is the FIMMDA Master Repo Agreement mandatory for all repo transactions?

No. It is mandatory only for repo transactions in Corporate Debt Securities settled bilaterally. For Government Securities repos settled through a CCP like CCIL, it is not mandatory due to the CCP's risk management safeguards.

What safeguards does a CCP like CCIL provide that make the FIMMDA agreement unnecessary?

CCIL provides safeguards including haircuts, mark-to-market pricing, margins, multilateral netting, closing out provisions, right to set off, settlement guarantee fund, and dispute resolution mechanisms.

Does this circular change any other terms of the earlier March 2010 circular?

No. All other terms and conditions of the March 2010 circular remain unchanged. Only the clarification on the mandatory nature of the FIMMDA Master Repo Agreement for CCP-settled G-Sec repos is provided.

Track this rule
⏳ How this rule evolved — History Map →Full RBI rulebook crosswalk →
AI-drafted · 3-model AI consensus fact-check · under the editorial review of Vikram Jain · decoded & published by BankPulse · 20 Jun 2026, 09:26 IST
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=6445&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by Vikram Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; never reproduces RBI text verbatim.